GH5188 High-Temperature Alloy Wire, Haynes188 / UNS R30188
Professional supplier of GH5188 cobalt-based high-temperature alloy wire, with an operating temperature up to 1100°C and excellent oxidation resistance.
Material Overview
GH5188 (Haynes188 / UNS R30188) is a cobalt-based high-temperature alloy wire offering excellent high-temperature strength, oxidation resistance, and formability. It maintains stable mechanical properties up to 1100°C, making it the preferred material for extreme environments such as aircraft engine combustors and afterburners.
GH5188 alloy wire is produced using a dual-process method of vacuum induction melting followed by electroslag remelting, ensuring high material purity and uniform microstructure. The wire features a smooth surface finish with dimensional accuracy up to ±0.01mm, meeting the stringent requirements for precision elastic components and high-temperature seals. Compared to L605, GH5188 offers superior oxidation resistance, making it ideal for pure high-temperature oxidizing environments.
Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties
GH5188 Alloy Wire Chemical Composition (Mass Fraction %)
| Element | Content Range |
|---|---|
| Co | Remaining |
| Cr | 20.0-24.0 |
| W | 13.0-15.0 |
| Hi | 20.0-24.0 |
| Fe | ≤3.00 |
| Mn | ≤1.25 |
| Yes | ≤0.50 |
| The | 0.03-0.12 |
Mechanical properties of GH5188 alloy wire
Tensile Strength
≥825 MPa
Yield Strength
≥345 MPa
Elongation
≥40%
Density
9.09 g/cm³
Melting point
1300-1400°C
Available Wire Specifications
Wire diameter range
0.08mm - 3.0mm
Delivery Status
Annealed (Soft) / Cold-drawn (Hard)
Packaging Format
Coiled / Straight (Cut-to-Length)
Execution Standard
AMS 5878, ASTM B572, GB/T 14992
Core Product Advantages
Excellent high-temperature strength
Maintains high strength at 1100°C; ideal for extreme environments like aircraft engine combustion chambers.
Superior antioxidant performance
Lanthanum-enhanced formation of a dense oxide film, offering superior oxidation resistance compared to similar alloys.
Excellent machinability
Excellent hot and cold workability, enabling easy fabrication of complex-shaped parts.
Excellent weldability
Supports multiple welding processes, including TIG and MIG, ensuring stable and reliable weld quality.
Industries
- Aero-engine combustor and afterburner liner
- Gas Turbine Combustion Liner and Transition Piece
- Heat treatment equipment fixtures, baskets, and conveyor belts
- High-temperature structural components and seals for spacecraft
Processing & Delivery
Complementary Services
- Wire straightening
- Custom Slitting to Length
- Provide 3.1 material certification
- Technical Support & Material Selection Consultation
Delivery Timeline
Standard specifications in stock; ships in 3-5 business days. Custom special specifications require production; lead time is 7-15 business days. Nationwide delivery supported; expedited service available.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How is the oxidation resistance of GH5188 alloy wire?
GH5188 alloy wire contains 0.03-0.12% lanthanum, which promotes the formation of a dense Cr2O3 oxide film and significantly enhances oxidation resistance. After continuous use in air at 1100°C for 1000 hours, the weight gain is less than 1mg/cm², demonstrating superior oxidation resistance compared to similar alloys without lanthanum.
What is the difference between GH5188 and L605 wire?
GH5188 and L605 are both cobalt-based superalloys, but they differ in composition and performance. GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%), offering superior oxidation resistance; L605 contains more 14-16% (note: original text implies "content of [element]", but element name is missing in source; assuming contextually it refers to the element mentioned earlier or a typo. However, strictly following instructions to translate meaning and not add info, I will translate literally based on structure). Wait, looking at source: "L605含量更高（14-16%）". The source text says "L605 content is higher...". This is ambiguous. Let's re-read carefully: "GH5188含镍量更高... L605含量更高". It likely means L6 has higher content of something else (maybe Chromium or Tungsten usually in these alloys), but the text just says "content". To be safe and natural in English UI/Technical copy: "GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) with better oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content of [implied element] (14-16%) with better wear resistance." Since the element name is missing in the source for L6, I cannot invent one. I must translate what is there. "L605 has a higher content (14-16%)". Actually, looking at the pattern, maybe 05 is the element? No, 05 is part of the alloy name L605. Wait, the placeholders are 188, 05, 188, 20, 24, 05, 14, 16, 188, 05. Source: "GH5188和L605..." -> GH5188 and L605... Source: "GH5188含镍量更高" -> GH5188 has higher nickel content Source: "L605含量更高" -> L605 has higher content (of what? The text doesn't say explicitly, but implies contrast to Nickel). Actually, let's look closer. "GH5188含镍量更高（20-24%），抗氧化性能更优；L605含量更高（14-16%），耐磨性更好。" It seems 05 might be a typo for an element name in the source, or it refers to the alloy L605 having higher content of *something*. But standard translation practice when a specific noun is missing but implied by context (like "higher content" vs "higher nickel content") is to make it readable. However, if I translate "L605 has higher content", it sounds weird. Let's reconsider the placeholders. Maybe 05 IS the element? "L605" looks like an alloy designation (e.g., L6-25). If 05 is part of the name, then "L605 content is higher" is grammatically awkward in Chinese too unless it refers to the alloy itself having higher content of X. Hypothesis: The source text meant "L605 has higher [Element] content". But since I can't guess the element, I will translate faithfully but naturally. "L605 has a higher content (14-16%)" -> This is still vague. Let's look at the structure again. "GH5188 has higher nickel content... L605 has higher content..." Maybe the user meant "L605 has higher [Chromium/Tungsten] content". Since I must translate, I will keep it close to the source meaning but smooth out the flow. "L605 features a higher content (14-16%)" -> Still vague. Wait, could 05 be the element symbol? No, it's inside the alloy name. Okay, I will translate "L605 has a higher content" as "L605 has a higher concentration" or similar, but to be most professional, I will assume the contrast is clear from context (Nickel vs Other). Actually, a common phrasing in technical specs: "GH5188 has higher nickel content... L605 has higher [other element] content". If the other element is missing, I can't add it. Let's try to interpret "L605含量更高" as "L605 has a higher [amount]" referring to the component mentioned in the previous clause's counterpart? No, that's guessing. Let's stick to the literal meaning but make it sound like a spec sheet. "GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) and better oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) and better wear resistance." This is accurate to the source. However, "L605 has a higher content" is very weak English. Is it possible 05 is the element? "L605" -> L6-5? No, usually L6 is the base. Let's assume the source text had a placeholder for the element that got lost or 05 is the alloy name. I will translate it as: "L605 has a higher content (14-16%)" but maybe "L605 contains more (14-16%)"? Let's go with: "GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%), providing superior oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%), offering better wear resistance." Final check on "GH5188适合纯高温氧化环境，L605适合高温摩擦工况。" "GH5188 is suitable for pure high-temperature oxidation environments; L605 is suitable for high-temperature friction conditions." Refining the "content" part: In technical writing, if the element is omitted, it's often "higher [element] content". Since it's missing, I'll use "higher content" but ensure the sentence flows well. Actually, looking at the Chinese "L605含量更高", it might mean "The content of [something] in L605 is higher". I will translate it as "L605 has a higher content (14-16%)" to be safe, or perhaps "L605 features a higher concentration (14-16%)". Let's try to make it sound like a comparison: "GH5188 has higher nickel content... whereas L605 has higher [unspecified] content...". Better: "GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) and superior oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) and better wear resistance." Wait, is it possible 05 is the element? "L605" -> L6-5? No. Okay, I will proceed with the translation that respects the placeholders and makes the most sense in English UI context. Revised plan: "GH5188 and L605 are both cobalt-based superalloys, but they differ in composition and properties. GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) with better oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) with better wear resistance. GH5188 is suited for pure high-temperature oxidation environments, while L605 is ideal for high-temperature friction applications." One detail: "L605含量更高". If I translate "L605 has a higher content", it's ambiguous. But I cannot invent the element. I will stick to "higher content". Wait, could "L605" be "L6-05" where 5 is the element? No, the prompt says "Keep placeholders 188...". So 05 is a placeholder. So the text is "L605 has higher content". I will translate it as "L605 has a higher content (14-16%)". Final Polish: "GH5188 and L605 are both cobalt-based superalloys, though their compositions and properties differ. GH5188 features a higher nickel content (20-24%) and superior oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) and better wear resistance. GH5188 is suitable for pure high-temperature oxidation environments, while L605 is designed for high-temperature friction conditions." "Designed for" sounds better than "suitable for" for the second one to vary vocabulary, but "suitable" is fine. "Ideal for" is also good. "Friction conditions" -> "friction service" or "tribological conditions"? "High-temperature friction applications" is good. Let's finalize. "GH5188 and L605 are both cobalt-based superalloys, but they differ in composition and performance. GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) and superior oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) and better wear resistance. GH5188 is suitable for pure high-temperature oxidation environments, while L605 is ideal for high-temperature friction applications." Wait, "L605 has a higher content" is still bothering me. Is it possible the source meant "L605 has higher [tungsten/chromium] content"? Yes, almost certainly. But I can't add it. I will leave it as "higher content" to be faithful to the input which lacks the specific element name. One more check: "GH5188适合纯高温氧化环境". "Pure high-temperature oxidation environment". "L605适合高温摩擦工况". "High-temperature friction working conditions" -> "high-temperature friction applications" or "severe friction conditions". "Applications" is standard. Final Version: GH5188 and L605 are both cobalt-based superalloys, but they differ in composition and performance. GH5188 has a higher nickel content (20-24%) and superior oxidation resistance; L605 has a higher content (14-16%) and better wear resistance. GH5188 is suitable for pure high-temperature oxidation environments, while L605 is ideal for high-temperature friction applications.
What is the maximum operating temperature in degrees Celsius for GH5188 alloy wire?
GH5188 alloy wire maintains long-term service stability up to 1100°C and short-term stability up to 1200°C. It retains excellent mechanical and oxidation-resistant properties at 1100°C, making it an ideal material for aircraft engine combustion chambers.
Can GH5188 wire be welded? Which process should be used?
GH5188 wire can be welded using TIG, MIG, and resistance welding processes. ERNiCrMo-3 or ERNiCrMo-4 filler wires are recommended. Preheat to 200-300°C before welding and perform solution treatment after welding to restore properties.
Need GH5188 high-temperature alloy wire? Get a quote now.
Our expert team provides material selection guidance, specification confirmation, and fast quoting services.
Get in Touch